21stcenturyjudaism

Israel’s historical responsibility is to face “giants.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

After their exodus from Egypt and experiences at Mount Sinai, the people of Israel arrived at Kadesh (located southwest of today’s kibbutz Sedeh Boqer in the Negev desert). Chapters 13 and 14 of the Book of Bamidbar (Numbers) tell us that there God gave the command:

'Send men to scout the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel;

After 40 days the scouts returned with somewhat discouraging reports:

...the people that dwell in the land are fierce, and the cities are fortified and very great; and moreover, we saw the children of Anak there.

“All we know about 'Anak' is that he was large and strong, an exemplar of the well-nourished and well-trained urban “men of name”- a giant in the eyes of peasants.”

Based on the different competing explanations in the TaNaKh itself, the history of the peoples of the area, and the archaeological data, scholars have questioned the historicity of the Scriptural story.

The arguments of modern research, without being conclusive, are refreshing. From a theological point of view, it is inconceivable that the God of Israel would want the destruction of a single life, much more so of whole nations, including innocent children. From a moral point of view, it is equally inconceivable that the “children of Israel” would be intoxicated by an ISIL’s type drive urging them to engage in genocidal destruction and cruelty. Or, a Hamas-type of disregard for innocent populations to evict Israel from their midst.

The true objective of the story of the “spies” in Numbers 13 is Israel and the problem of faith. Israel must do what is demanded from her, not merely what is humanly reasonable. In the Numbers story, Israel’s historical responsibility is to face “giants.”

Tellingly, this story generated during Israel’s birth period has been premonitory. After hundreds of years of exile, new generations have gradually come back to the land of their ancestors. They returned not as conquering foreigners unified in a single entity. They came as individuals and groups, gradually transforming the land so its inhabitants would be allowed to move closer to the realization of their potential.

The present State of Israel probably mirrors closely what happened at the time of Israel’s beginnings in the Land of Israel. There was a process of transformation, which in all possibilities included, like today, bloody localized confrontations between a culture that glorifies death and Israel’s culture, with its optimistic outlook on life and its concern for all life, human life in particular.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *